Why allow speculation in commodities future options and exchange rate ? - commodity futures exchange
Prices for raw materials continue to rise, which are the speculators? Who are the victims? As these speculators play money Paly bloody power games?
Who are these heartless people deserve the billions of dirty money of the poor?
Why can not the politicians, the media, the economists, that people with the voice of reason, the truth about these dirty tricks, or try to stop them?
Why do they all lie? That gives us all kinds of information unrealistic?
Well, until now, there are no appropriate standards in the banks and financial institutions such as laws to prevent such evil intention to speculate on all kinds of goods, exchange rates ...?
There are many types of options for the future were created by the banks, financial institutions, commercial campaign, ...
Well, until now, it is not the appropriate control speculation using these tools for future options and the names nor the coverage of free trade ....?
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Commodity Futures Exchange Why Allow Speculation In Commodities Future Options And Exchange Rate ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
r example, banks that have invested heavily in real estate is plummeting, but the forced landing may be impeded as money earned through investments in commodities. When this happens, could mean the forced landing is simply a coincidence. That would be bad for the economy and make things worse for the poor.
3) The media improvise food prices, which hysteria. CNN and others, under the theme "Food Crisis", as if we all run away, I hunger, prices for most of the speculators, "Hey, it go even higher!" In the grand scheme of things, the food is not expensive (at least in the not U.S., sure) about other countries. The white bread is up 16 cents since last year. This kind of thing. Percentage wise it may lead to an increase of 20% or something, but his portfolio as 16 cents. It was an article on CNN recently about a poor mother of 2 children who have their own detergent. I had to wash, because 12 loads one or two days. Not sure what the price of the detergent has to do with food at PRICES, but CNN seems to be an example of how we are all on the brink of starvation.
4) As is so often cited when it comes to the market, "At the beginning of what the wise fools do in the end." The speculation is an aspect of self-correction in the market ask. Farmers and oil men. There are many oil and food prices for everyone. Large investors shifted money from their property when they invest something better and there will be a sharp correction. As with the Internet bubble and the housing bubble. When the third cousin Billy Joe starts talking about investing in gold or oil, as he heard his a good investment for the pop bubble.
The idea that speculation, "market forces" (whatever the hell that means), bubbles, etc. .. It may seem like a terrible form of "cruel sound" people earn money. But the reality was the best way to ensure that everyone has a piece of cake. If governments are starting prices, shortages are legion. In some cases, really bad, like Zimbabwe or Venezuela, pricingreached a point that there is simply no way to grow for farmers on crops.
I agree with that speculation in the markets for raw materials could hurt people) (gas / food prices, and there should be some control as you, but the ideal way to curb speculation is invited to spend their money elsewhere move. When U.S. stocks start, a lot of investors moving their dollar change in the stock market. Or, if the interest rates set in U.S. dollars in bonds. To do at this stage, the performance of investments in commodities, but not worried. The bubble commodities, futures, 'pop' and watch the people on fundamentals in these markets.
Rant feel better?
How to know exactly been the main justification for the commodity market is the need for reporting. But feel the speculation to be offensive, may, during the high proportion of transactions in these markets are more than speculation (90% cover), there is still a need for reporting.
The first question we must answer, there is a way to fulfill the need for reporting, while they deny (or at least less attractive) options for the kind of speculation which seems to be so passionate?
Second, even taking into account the fact that people deserve to criticize attributive adjective and used it, right?
1. What interest has to tell someone the truth? What help is a politician to say the truth? If the history of democracies is, everything that shows that most of the time, most people prefer it, (and) a convenient lie, instead of voting a painful truth. To make Politicains lies and promises that & # 039, T, completely, perhaps because it do to your advantage to this - who is elected!
2. Do we really want a world in which the judge intentions rather than actions? In what morally objectionable, illegal? One of the basic principles of the United States is a republic - which means that the government is limited, have the human rights, as we really a society where the government will do what you want, if you wish, whatever right? or in which the majority decides, no matter what he does to the minority? This does not mean that the government always obeys the rules, the law or the Constitution, but it is not better to have a constitution, which is sometimes derided as nothing?
We live in a capitalist society. He has many faults. Can be improved. But one expects that makes them act against their own interests, no sense. People say they have tried to companies that are based on altruism. None have been tested appear to have lasted long. Are you proposing try again? If so, why wait until the result is the best? They complain about human nature, and that seems to exist? Are you saying that human nature can and should be changed? Are you saying that human nature is inherently better than it seems? or to say just because you do not like the results do not give you observe a better way?
The advantage of a larger scale, consider that almost everyone on earth comes from the people who killed the other, the country has stolen the other, other slaves, etc. How many are prepared to give their "illegal?" Or say because their ancestors are not, themselves, who have committed crimes, should be allowed to keep their fruit?
And their ancestors? Some say, "there was a drought, we were hungry, not when you press the X from their lands and use them would have died." And in many cases that had been true. Justifies the murder?
The obvious answer to all this is "doesn'thAVE. OK, maybe it's true. But say it does not mean it's true. Hear are the result of a reflection on its role, some knowledge about the history and economy. Rants so boring.
Post a Comment